# Leeds, Washington County Water Quality: Reports & Results

> Canonical source: [Leeds, Washington County Water Quality: Reports & Results](https://www.utahwaterquality.com/leeds-water-quality)

Find 4 possible drinking-water providers for Leeds, Washington County. Find available annual reports, recorded status, and provider-specific results.

Washington County · Local drinking-water guide Leeds water quality Start with your provider. Find public reports, understand the available results, and see where each fact comes from. Possible providers 4 Status records through June 30, 2026 Page facts updated October 30, 2026 Plain-language summary What do the records show? Leeds is linked to 4 possible public water providers in the available records. Match the provider on your water bill before using a report. City and ZIP boundaries do not establish who serves an individual home. Available measurements include Lead (90th percentile), Nitrate, Uranium, Haloacetic Acids Five (HAA5). They belong to the named provider and sampling period shown below. Newest annual report listed Not available A report year is different from its sample years. Providers with results here 4 of 4 63 measurements available below. Newest sample year shown 2023 Results describe their stated sampling period. A public record cannot guarantee the water at your faucet. For an active advisory, follow the issuing agency and your provider’s current instructions. What is in the drinking water? Provider water measurements These results belong to the provider named below. Some show a yearly average; others show a reported result or range. Check your provider’s original report for the full explanation. Provider-specific results · UTAH27010 LEEDS DOMESTIC WATER USERS ASSOCIATION U.S. EPA SDWIS lead and copper monitoring records Open original source ↗ These are 90th-percentile monitoring summaries for the stated reporting periods. Individual sample dates are not supplied. A reported zero is retained as published; it does not establish that lead or copper is absent at an individual faucet. Provider-specific measurements for LEEDS DOMESTIC WATER USERS ASSOCIATION Contaminant or characteristic Sample period Reported result or range Unit Limit supplied by source Source compliance statement Lead (90th percentile)Lead and Copper Rule monitoring · 90th percentileSource stream: monitoring-period/2021-01-01/2023-12-31 2021-01-01 to 2023-12-31 (reporting period) 0.0025System-level 90th percentile of tap samples for the stated monitoring period. The period boundaries are reporting windows, not individual sample dates. A missing result-sign code is retained as unspecified; a zero is not relabeled as a non-detection. Individual household lead or copper concentrations can differ. mg/L Not supplied A monitoring-period 90th percentile is not a compliance determination or a measurement of an individual household's water. Utah IBIS yearly mean drinking-water concentrations Open original source ↗ These are annual monitoring averages, not individual sample results or compliance determinations. A reported zero does not establish that every sample was below detection. Sampling years are shown separately from the date this site retrieved the data. Historical annual means from Utah public monitoring records. Latest published years vary by contaminant and provider; seasonal and emergency sources are excluded. Sampling frequency and within-system variability differ. These averages cannot establish an individual tap result, detection status, or current compliance. Provider-specific measurements for LEEDS DOMESTIC WATER USERS ASSOCIATION Contaminant or characteristic Sample period Reported result or range Unit Limit supplied by source Source compliance statement NitrateHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2022 0.05 mg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. A detection is not automatically a violation. Household plumbing can also affect water measured at an individual tap. Provider-specific results · UTAH27074 ANGELL SPRINGS SSD U.S. EPA SDWIS lead and copper monitoring records Open original source ↗ These are 90th-percentile monitoring summaries for the stated reporting periods. Individual sample dates are not supplied. A reported zero is retained as published; it does not establish that lead or copper is absent at an individual faucet. Provider-specific measurements for ANGELL SPRINGS SSD Contaminant or characteristic Sample period Reported result or range Unit Limit supplied by source Source compliance statement Lead (90th percentile)Lead and Copper Rule monitoring · 90th percentileSource stream: monitoring-period/2020-01-01/2022-12-31 2020-01-01 to 2022-12-31 (reporting period) 0.0006System-level 90th percentile of tap samples for the stated monitoring period. The period boundaries are reporting windows, not individual sample dates. A missing result-sign code is retained as unspecified; a zero is not relabeled as a non-detection. Individual household lead or copper concentrations can differ. mg/L Not supplied A monitoring-period 90th percentile is not a compliance determination or a measurement of an individual household's water. Utah IBIS yearly mean drinking-water concentrations Open original source ↗ These are annual monitoring averages, not individual sample results or compliance determinations. A reported zero does not establish that every sample was below detection. Sampling years are shown separately from the date this site retrieved the data. Historical annual means from Utah public monitoring records. Latest published years vary by contaminant and provider; seasonal and emergency sources are excluded. Sampling frequency and within-system variability differ. These averages cannot establish an individual tap result, detection status, or current compliance. Provider-specific measurements for ANGELL SPRINGS SSD Contaminant or characteristic Sample period Reported result or range Unit Limit supplied by source Source compliance statement UraniumHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2016 2.60 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. Haloacetic Acids Five (HAA5)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2023 1.00 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2023 0.25 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. Trichloroethene (TCE)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2019 0.25 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. Radium-228Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2016 0.14 pCi/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. Tetrachloroethene (PCE)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2019 0.25 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. NitrateHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2023 0.93 mg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. ArsenicHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2022 3.20 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. A detection is not automatically a violation. Household plumbing can also affect water measured at an individual tap. Provider-specific results · UTAH27018 TOQUERVILLE TOWN WATER SYSTEM U.S. EPA SDWIS lead and copper monitoring records Open original source ↗ These are 90th-percentile monitoring summaries for the stated reporting periods. Individual sample dates are not supplied. A reported zero is retained as published; it does not establish that lead or copper is absent at an individual faucet. Provider-specific measurements for TOQUERVILLE TOWN WATER SYSTEM Contaminant or characteristic Sample period Reported result or range Unit Limit supplied by source Source compliance statement Lead (90th percentile)Lead and Copper Rule monitoring · 90th percentileSource stream: monitoring-period/2023-01-01/2025-12-31 2023-01-01 to 2025-12-31 (reporting period) 0System-level 90th percentile of tap samples for the stated monitoring period. The period boundaries are reporting windows, not individual sample dates. A missing result-sign code is retained as unspecified; a zero is not relabeled as a non-detection. Individual household lead or copper concentrations can differ. mg/L Not supplied A monitoring-period 90th percentile is not a compliance determination or a measurement of an individual household's water. Utah IBIS yearly mean drinking-water concentrations Open original source ↗ These are annual monitoring averages, not individual sample results or compliance determinations. A reported zero does not establish that every sample was below detection. Sampling years are shown separately from the date this site retrieved the data. Historical annual means from Utah public monitoring records. Latest published years vary by contaminant and provider; seasonal and emergency sources are excluded. Sampling frequency and within-system variability differ. These averages cannot establish an individual tap result, detection status, or current compliance. Provider-specific measurements for TOQUERVILLE TOWN WATER SYSTEM Contaminant or characteristic Sample period Reported result or range Unit Limit supplied by source Source compliance statement UraniumHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2022 3.60 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. Haloacetic Acids Five (HAA5)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2023 1.00 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2023 2.76 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. Trichloroethene (TCE)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2023 0.25 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. Radium-228Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2016 0.39 pCi/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. Tetrachloroethene (PCE)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2023 0.25 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. NitrateHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2023 1.15 mg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. Di (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2022 0.65 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. AtrazineHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2022 0.11 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. ArsenicHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2022 6.60 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. A detection is not automatically a violation. Household plumbing can also affect water measured at an individual tap. Provider-specific results · UTAH27071 WASHINGTON COUNTY WCD - COTTAM U.S. EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data Open original source ↗ Provider-specific measurements for WASHINGTON COUNTY WCD - COTTAM Contaminant or characteristic Sample period Reported result or range Unit Limit supplied by source Source compliance statement 11Cl-PF3OUdSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.005Reporting limit: 0.005 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. 4:2 FTSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. 6:2 FTSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.005Reporting limit: 0.005 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. 8:2 FTSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.005Reporting limit: 0.005 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. 9Cl-PF3ONSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.002Reporting limit: 0.002 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. ADONAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. HFPO-DAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.005Reporting limit: 0.005 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. NEtFOSAAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.005Reporting limit: 0.005 µg/LMethod: EPA 537.1Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. NFDHAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.02Reporting limit: 0.02 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. NMeFOSAAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.006Reporting limit: 0.006 µg/LMethod: EPA 537.1Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFBAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.005Reporting limit: 0.005 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFBSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFDAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFDoAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFEESAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFHpAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFHpSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFHxAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFHxSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFMBAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFMPAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.004Reporting limit: 0.004 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFNAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.004Reporting limit: 0.004 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFOAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.004Reporting limit: 0.004 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFOSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.004Reporting limit: 0.004 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFPeAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFPeSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.004Reporting limit: 0.004 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFTAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.008Reporting limit: 0.008 µg/LMethod: EPA 537.1Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFTrDAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.007Reporting limit: 0.007 µg/LMethod: EPA 537.1Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. PFUnAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <0.002Reporting limit: 0.002 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. lithiumUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP001 2023Collected: 2023-10-23 <9Reporting limit: 9 µg/LMethod: EPA 200.7Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit. µg/L Not supplied UCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination. U.S. EPA SDWIS lead and copper monitoring records Open original source ↗ These are 90th-percentile monitoring summaries for the stated reporting periods. Individual sample dates are not supplied. A reported zero is retained as published; it does not establish that lead or copper is absent at an individual faucet. Provider-specific measurements for WASHINGTON COUNTY WCD - COTTAM Contaminant or characteristic Sample period Reported result or range Unit Limit supplied by source Source compliance statement Lead (90th percentile)Lead and Copper Rule monitoring · 90th percentileSource stream: monitoring-period/2023-01-01/2025-12-31 2023-01-01 to 2025-12-31 (reporting period) 0.0034System-level 90th percentile of tap samples for the stated monitoring period. The period boundaries are reporting windows, not individual sample dates. A missing result-sign code is retained as unspecified; a zero is not relabeled as a non-detection. Individual household lead or copper concentrations can differ. mg/L Not supplied A monitoring-period 90th percentile is not a compliance determination or a measurement of an individual household's water. Lead (90th percentile)Lead and Copper Rule monitoring · 90th percentileSource stream: monitoring-period/2023-01-01/2025-12-31 2023-01-01 to 2025-12-31 (reporting period) 0.0034System-level 90th percentile of tap samples for the stated monitoring period. The period boundaries are reporting windows, not individual sample dates. A missing result-sign code is retained as unspecified; a zero is not relabeled as a non-detection. Individual household lead or copper concentrations can differ. mg/L Not supplied A monitoring-period 90th percentile is not a compliance determination or a measurement of an individual household's water. Utah IBIS yearly mean drinking-water concentrations Open original source ↗ These are annual monitoring averages, not individual sample results or compliance determinations. A reported zero does not establish that every sample was below detection. Sampling years are shown separately from the date this site retrieved the data. Historical annual means from Utah public monitoring records. Latest published years vary by contaminant and provider; seasonal and emergency sources are excluded. Sampling frequency and within-system variability differ. These averages cannot establish an individual tap result, detection status, or current compliance. Provider-specific measurements for WASHINGTON COUNTY WCD - COTTAM Contaminant or characteristic Sample period Reported result or range Unit Limit supplied by source Source compliance statement Haloacetic Acids Five (HAA5)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2023 16.40 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2023 34.50 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. Trichloroethene (TCE)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2022 0.25 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. Radium-228Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2013 0.34 pCi/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. Tetrachloroethene (PCE)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2022 0.25 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. NitrateHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2023 0.05 mg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. Di (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2020 0.65 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. AtrazineHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2020 0.11 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. ArsenicHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean 2023 1.00 µg/L Not supplied This annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance. A detection is not automatically a violation. Household plumbing can also affect water measured at an individual tap. What water systems may serve Leeds? Possible water providers Compare the provider name and ID with your bill. These records describe public systems; plumbing inside a home can also affect water at the tap. 01 / Possible provider LEEDS DOMESTIC WATER USERS ASSOCIATION Water provider ID: UTAH27010 Reported statusNo reported open violationsAs of June 30, 2026 Open health violations 0 Open testing or reporting violations 0 Annual report year Not available Status records, annual reports, and individual sample dates can cover different periods. Check current provider notices before relying on an older record. 02 / Possible provider ANGELL SPRINGS SSD Water provider ID: UTAH27074 Reported statusReported open monitoring or reporting violationsAs of June 30, 2026 Open health violations 0 Open testing or reporting violations 1 Annual report year Not available Status records, annual reports, and individual sample dates can cover different periods. Check current provider notices before relying on an older record. 03 / Possible provider TOQUERVILLE TOWN WATER SYSTEM Water provider ID: UTAH27018 Reported statusNo reported open violationsAs of June 30, 2026 Open health violations 0 Open testing or reporting violations 0 Annual report year Not available Status records, annual reports, and individual sample dates can cover different periods. Check current provider notices before relying on an older record. 04 / Possible provider WASHINGTON COUNTY WCD - COTTAM Water provider ID: UTAH27071 Reported statusNo reported open violationsAs of June 30, 2026 Open health violations 0 Open testing or reporting violations 0 Annual report year Not available Status records, annual reports, and individual sample dates can cover different periods. Check current provider notices before relying on an older record. How should I interpret this page? Important limitations City and ZIP boundaries do not identify a household's water provider. Use address lookup for the most specific result. “No reported open violations” means only that none were reported in the latest available records. It does not mean “safe,” “clean,” or “pass.” Regulatory data can lag local notices. Where did these facts come from? Where the information comes from EPA Public Water System Service AreasUnited States Environmental Protection Agency · last successful October 6, 2026Open source ↗ EPA Safe Drinking Water Information SystemUnited States Environmental Protection Agency · last successful October 6, 2026Open source ↗ Utah Geospatial Resource Center Place BoundariesUtah Geospatial Resource Center · last successful October 30, 2026Open source ↗ Utility Consumer Confidence ReportsPublic water system operators · last successful November 2, 2026Open source ↗ Understand the numbers Read your water report Find the sample year, units, limits, and violation column. Confirm your provider Look up an address Find possible matches, then check against your bill. Use a private well? Start with well testing A nearby public-water report does not describe a private well. Stay informed Get water-quality alerts for Leeds Enter your email and location to receive relevant water-quality alerts. You can change the city or ZIP code before submitting. EmailZIP code or cityGet alerts What nearby pages can I check? Related locations Hildale, Washington Hurricane, Washington ZIP Code 84783, Washington ZIP Code 84782, Washington ZIP Code 84738, Washington ZIP Code 84733, Washington ZIP Code 84765, Washington Springdale, Washington Rockville, Washington St. George, Washington ZIP Code 84763, Washington ZIP Code 84780, Washington ZIP Code 84746, Washington ZIP Code 84784, Washington Washington, Washington Enterprise, Washington New Harmony, Washington Ivins, Washington ZIP Code 84745, Washington ZIP Code 84779, Washington